As I said in #wcop, this acquittal basically reconfirms that our justice system is working.
reposted from facebook:
so, zimmerman not guilty. while some angry people are saying this frees me up to shoot every black person i found on the street, i'd be more worried if we got a justice system where you could convict someone of a crime simply because you wanted to make a political statement. Whatever larger political significance this trial may have, the jurors don't believe the prosecution proved beyond a reasonable doubt that zimmerman's shooting of martin was not in self-defense, and that's what it comes down to in the end.
with the virtually complete lack of evidence for the prosecution in this case, it's hard to prove shit beyond a reasonable doubt.
Basically wraps it up entirely. I think we're all over simplifying what we
believe happened. Most believe that Zimmerman murdered the poor child in cold blood for racial reasons. The prosecution's own witness, told to testify about Zimmerman's injuries, however, states that he was in fact slammed on the ground (considering the injuries to the back of the head), and punched at least once, though possibly multiple times. From what I've read, the prosecution's case were filled with both inconsistencies and witnesses actually making statements in Zimmerman's favor. The bottom line is, the case that the prosecution brought, at least in the jurors' minds, did not and could not prove that Zimmerman murdered Trayvon Martin in cold blood as suggested by the masses, as self defense is a legitimate concern.
It is important to note that the United States Justice System leans towards the defendant in these cases for good reason. The state, when making its cases, has unlimited resources and manpower for the prosecution. The defense does not have these luxuries. It is only expected, then, that the State will both follow procedural law in acquiring evidence and making its case, and that a tie (so to speak) goes to the defense. The burden of proof does not lie on the defense. One should never have to prove they are innocent. Zimmerman should not have to prove he is innocent. It is up to the State to prove that he is guilty. They did not do so, so he walks. It's as simple as that.
No one supports the unfortunate circumstances that led to what happened that night, but even still, we cannot include our own personal biases when arbitrating justice. If the Criminal Justice System isn't fair, what hope is there, really, for the accused?