That said, I have come up with an alternate clause: Forme Clause. With the way BH works in regards to Formes being legal turn 1, such a Clause would make sense for this meta. And it does not have to arbitrarily be limited to 2 but can follow the standard usage of clauses where the limit is 1. Thus, Forme Clause would be defined as “Only one of the same Pokémon Forme can be used”. I believe this Forme Clause tackles the same concerns the proposed 2 Species Clause did.
But what about Formes of Arceus or Magearna whom can literally use 2 forms of the same type, stats, and abilities without any differences beyond aesthetics.Just a reminder to all, the poll will be ending today - view the link in the OP for the exact time. In addition, the species clause will be replaced with the forme clause as confirmed by The Immortal:
user | Forme Clause | Shell Smash | Other: Shedinja | Other: Name Clause | Other: none | |
Quantum Tesseract | 1 | |||||
In The Hills | 1 | |||||
fwqef | 1 | |||||
chessking345 | 1 | |||||
willdbeast | 1 | |||||
Marsopa Trump & Test Rex | 1 | |||||
Chloe | 1 | |||||
WhitePhoenixAce | 1 | |||||
motherlove | 1 | |||||
Funbot28 | 1 | |||||
Mickle314 | 1 | |||||
a loser | 1 | |||||
abriel gabram | 1 | |||||
Chazm | 1 | |||||
Cfchor | 1 | |||||
pazza | 1 | |||||
tzop | 1 | |||||
OM! | 1 | |||||
Gurpreet Patel | 1 | |||||
ElMustacho | 1 | |||||
GL Volkner | 1 | |||||
Anaconja | 1 | |||||
ShedMiddleFinga | 1 | |||||
Ransei | 1 | |||||
Balanced Freakmons | 1 | |||||
LaBalladeDesCieux | 1 | |||||
Andyboy | 1 | |||||
DarkBersker | 1 | |||||
Pyroshi02 | 1 | |||||
SuperSkylake | 1 | |||||
Magii | 1 | |||||
Rumors | 1 | |||||
thepotato513 | 1 | |||||
Coldembrace | 1 | |||||
DF-Shock | 1 | |||||
Jho | 1 | |||||
Catalystic | 1 | |||||
PinkDragonTamer | 1 | |||||
xavgb | 1 | |||||
Betathunder | 1 | |||||
SectoniaServant | 1 | |||||
jasprose | 1 | |||||
E4 Flint | 1 | |||||
finally | 1 | |||||
hosemisnuba | 1 | |||||
xapx | 1 | |||||
Totals | 17 | 0 | 20 | 1 | 8 | 46 |