Machamp [Outdated, Magcargo 2 is taking over]

[TheManlyLadybug]

"i'm going to add a gimmicky set that is terrible in the metagame due to the fact that it still doesnt do shit for damage even with specs and having stab and fire blast as the movepool and call it a day, that'll impress the cc team"

jesus christ please stop

You better take that back.

 

[Minus]

Catch the opponent off guard? Why yes, of course! Will it manage to KO the other Pokemon? Fuck no. A ton of this stuff seems like Theorymon and not actual play testing....

 

[TheManlyLadybug]

That's enough now. I never considered Specs Machamp to be viable, and Specs Machamp will never, ever be viable.

 

[trc]

That's enough now. I never actually considered Specs Machamp to be viable.

._.

 

[Kangaaroo]

Along with the plethora of things wrong with this as stated above, it's worth mentioning that Knock Off hits Psychic-types super-effectively.

EDIT: Also mention that Bullet Punch deals super-effective damage to Fairy-types.

 

[Bouff]

...then why did you say that you wanted to add it?

as i said in the main thread dont make analyses if you don't know what the fuck you're doing

 

[Minus]

Tml, do you need any assistance with this? I'm sure many people will be glad to help ^.^

 

[TheManlyLadybug]

Tml, do you need any assistance with this? I'm sure many people will be glad to help ^.^

I can't tell if you're being sincere or if you're just mocking me.

 

[Kangaaroo]

Well it doesn't matter anymore, this analyses has been dropped.

 

[Minus]

I can't tell if you're being sincere or if you're just mocking me.

I'm not mocking you. I'm a mentor, I'm kinda required to step in and say stuff like that...so do you need help?

 

[Kangaaroo]

I'm not mocking you. I'm a mentor, I'm kinda required to step in and say stuff like that...so do you need help?

He's dropped the analyses.

 

[Minus]

He may choose otherwise if he gets help.

 

[TheManlyLadybug]

I'm not mocking you. I'm a mentor, I'm kinda required to step in and say stuff like that...so do you need help?

I don't really need help (as in I need to be cuddled throughout the analysis), I understand what Machamp can and can't do (contrary to what other people who have posted in this thread think). I dropped the analysis b/c of the mockery surrounding SpecsChamp, but if everyone would stop that, I might reconsider and continue with the analysis.

Guys I know what I'm doing. I'm working on a UU Starmie analysis and have completed a couple analyses in OU, I have a general idea of what's viable and what isn't. Please stop the criticizing

 

[Kangaaroo]

I don't really need help (as in I need to be cuddled throughout the analysis), I understand what Machamp can and can't do (contrary to what other people who have posted in this thread think). I dropped the analysis b/c of the mockery surrounding SpecsChamp, but if everyone would stop that, I might reconsider and continue with the analysis.

Guys I know what I'm doing. I'm working on a UU Starmie analysis and have completed a couple analyses in OU, I have a general idea of what's viable and what isn't. Please stop the criticizing

It's constructive criticism, without it these analyses' wouldn't be as good as they are. This analysis isn't by any means bad, it's just that there were a few nitpicks that needed to be fixed (and they have been) and you were just a little too aggressive. Anyway, that's over and done now. Let's get back onto what we should be talking about, the analysis. It would be nice if you'd take up the this again and change everything that has been suggested, and this will be really good! :)

 

[TheManlyLadybug]

It's constructive criticism, without it these analyses' wouldn't be as good as they are. This analysis isn't by any means bad, it's just that there were a few nitpicks that needed to be fixed (and they have been) and you were just a little too aggressive. Anyway, that's over and done now. Let's get back onto what we should be talking about, the analysis. It would be nice if you'd take up the this again and change everything that has been suggested, and this will be really good! :)

It isn't constructive criticism, I'm not stupid. Only 3 out of the last 20-25 posts were ones that actually contributed to the analysis.

Nevertheless, I appreciate the support, thanks a lot. :)

I'm not an aggressive person, it's just that I hate being blamed / mocked for something that I didn't do / isn't my fault

 

[TheManlyLadybug]

I am contemplating quitting Smogon. After what happened here, a lot of people in this forum now automatically assume that I am ignorant, stupid, childish, that I don't know a shred of information about Pokemon or their viability, that I'm overly aggressive, that I need to be babied through an analysis, and that I couldn't write a decent analysis in a million years, which isn't who I am at all, but of course you guys won't listen to me. My reputation has been greatly hurt, I'm not sure if I can go on like this.

 

[LightningLuxray]

I am contemplating quitting Smogon. After what happened here, a lot of people in this forum now automatically assume that I am ignorant, stupid, childish, that I don't know a shred of information about Pokemon or their viability, that I'm overly aggressive, that I need to be babied through an analysis, and that I couldn't write a decent analysis in a million years, which isn't who I am at all, but of course you guys won't listen to me. My reputation has been greatly hurt, I'm not sure if I can go on like this.

That's a little over-dramatic... Don't worry we all know you can write analyses lol. I mean you've written Shuckle/Lando-T well. Just try to think about what you're suggesting. I mean from the looks of it, it doesn't seem you have the best understanding of Machamp's best sets. If you ask me, I'd just give this one to Magcargo 2 and switch to Shuckle, a Pokemon I and everyone else knows you have knowledge about.

Looks no one thinks your stupid, but when you tell us to discuss about SpecsChamp we're probably going to go a little crazy lol. :]

 

[TheManlyLadybug]

That's a little over-dramatic... Don't worry we all know you can write analyses lol. I mean you've written Shuckle/Lando-T well. Just try to think about what you're suggesting. I mean from the looks of it, it doesn't seem you have the best understanding of Machamp's best sets. If you ask me, I'd just give this one to Magcargo 2 and switch to Shuckle, a Pokemon I and everyone else knows you have knowledge about.

Looks no one thinks your stupid, but when you tell us to discuss about SpecsChamp we're probably going to go a little crazy lol. :]

I know you and other people think I can write analyses but try asking the same thing to TRC. or Bouffalant

Either way, I'll take your advice and reserve Shuckle

 

[Bouff]

i think you can but just dont tell people to use things that you think are viable when they clearly are not, no offense.

 

[TheManlyLadybug]

i think you can but just dont tell people to use things that you think are viable when they clearly are not, no offense.

I never told people to use Specs Machamp. Either way, moving on.

Thank you

 

[Minus]

Before this gets out of hand again, kokoloko, would you mind moving this to L&O?

/minimodding