My friend, the simplest way to respond to this (which is not really a question) is that this ground has been well-traveled before, and the fact that half of your post lays out exceptions really speaks to why fooling around with it is a bad idea.I want to unban Blaziken, but to unban a Blaze Blaziken and ban Speed Boost Blaziken and Mega Blaziken. I know it's a complex ban but I don't see the problem if this is made as a special case:
Why a "special case"?
-Because there's clearly a huge difference between Blaze Blaziken and Speed Boost Blaziken. Speed Boost is clearly Uber, Blaze Blaziken is expected to be UU/RU.
-The majority of the Ubers don't have Hidden Abilities (or had them Unreleased). And the only ones in my mind are Mewtwo (not a difference), Lugia (still broken), Ho-oH (still broken), Dialga (not a difference), Palkia (not a difference), Giratina (not a difference).
I only apply this complex ban ONLY:
-If the broken ability is a Hidden Ability.
-If the standard ability is clearly not broken in any way.
-The pokemon is not on the banlist of Nintendo.
-Only applies to the banlist of OU/Ubers. The other banlists BL/UU, BL2/RU, BL3/NU won't have case of this (sorry, Competitive Gothitelle won't be allowed if it's banned in a higher tier that's not OU because Shadow Tag).
And the complex ban is NOT a precedent to banning item + Pokemon, moves + Pokemon, separate pokemon by abilities. No ban Air Slash Shaymin Sky (which I think it can be handled in OU now; but is uncompetitive), no ban Dark Void Darkrai, and other cases like that.
Reaching a consensus on the exact particulars of the ban is not a thing that would happen. Smogonites are a bit of a competitive lot (if you haven't noticed) and that tends to bleed over into banning discussions as well.
That's the secret, you see. There's no unwritten prejudice. The OU council doesn't have a secret supervillain who inexplicably has "prevent complex bans on Smogon" as step three of his five-step world domination plan. We're just a bunch of competitive, argumentative people who have a hard time agreeing on anything more complex than an up-or-down single-subject ban, and some of those are plenty contentious enough as it is. Throwing complex bans into the mix would mean we'd be lucky to get a suspect test ballot put together, much less actually carry one out.