It's always difficult to make a descision in this sort of competition as it's almost impossible to keep bias out of it. For instance I see this thread, and in my head I've already decided I'm picking a team with a more offensive Stakataka. That means right off the bat I'm eliminating Team 3 (although it has no ground type, which makes me uncomfortable). Next I look at the TR team posted (Team 6) see 5 setters and a marowak, only 1 momentum grab in lunar dance cress, and a lack of set up to really bulldoze fatter builds making me eliminate that. Next team I look at is Team 4, which seems promising just looking at the 6 mons with no ideas on sets. However, I then see that the team is dreadfully slow as it's lacking a scarfer, and I just can't keep it in the running. Next I look at Team 5 which once again lacks a scarfer, but it's bulky enough to compensate. Yet, I'm a big fan of having teams that can pretty soundly beat Volcarona, as that thing scares me, but with only pex detering that behemoth I fear the Psychium-z set a little to much. This leaves me with Team 1 and Team 2 which are both solid enough to use imo, so I must once again bring bias back into this competition and vote for the team I'd rather use. This lends my vote to Team 2 as a more bulky offensive approach is what I would've gone with, since I'm just not a fan of using Screens HO in general.